BDTI’s Survey on “Responsiblity for Fukushima” (Responses Regarding the Board, Now in English)

OnBDTI's Japanese discussion forum, you can download all the responses we have received so farto our survey on who and what are responsible for Fukushima?As you might guess, manyof the responses are pithy and from the heart, and seem to indicate achange in the mood of the populusregarding the need to to improvecorporate governace and risk management.

http://bdti.or.jp/node/354

“Fiduciary Fraud”, by Hilmar Nierop

Hilmar Hierop has asked us to upload his paper on fiduciary fraud, aconcept now getting more traction inEuropean legal circles. Fiduciary fraud concerns fraud in the context of a relationship between a fiduciary and a beneficiary. Essential to fiduciary fraud is the non-compliance with the fiduciary duty of (absolute) loyalty of the fiduciary towards the beneficiaries and with the requirements regarding prudent asset management and the full and timely disclosure of conflicts of interest, which are inherent to the financial sector.

Japanese versus US handling of JSOX/SOX Control Deficiencies

In regards to Subsidiary (in the US) versus US Public Company responsses to JSOX/SOX deficiencies: US Company Execs seem quite accepting of having a handful of minor deficiencies found each quarter as long as there are no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. They treat these minor deficiencies as a method of improvement to deal with […]

Attitudes Towards Corporate Governance: How do Japanese Views Compare with the Views of Long-Time Foreign Residents Here?

Although there were not enough foreign respondents to BDTI's survey on attitudes by them towards corporate governance to make the results statistically significant, we did get 72 respondents and a number of insights and interesting contrasts.

The full-fledged (prior) response results from Japanese participantsare summarized at bottom below.Below, are some ofthe intriguing highlightsandcontrasts from the survey of foreigners.