On December 11, 2019, I gave a lecture on BDTI’s analysis about corporate governance practices and and firm performance in Japan. Since then we have added indicators of statistical significance to our materials. To view the entire presentation as translated into English, click here: Presentation to Securities Analyst Association 2019.12.11. Those who read Japanese can read the full speech here, and can download the Japanese version of the presentation materials.
Our methodology is shown on page 23 . Our analysis suggests that the adoption of the followhttps://bit.ly/2TBSgaZing practices leads is followed by (appears to cause) improvements in ROA compared to the average for a firm’s industry over the next two years. Please see the charts on the left side of each page:
- Adding an nomination committee of some sort (p. 27)
- Appointing an outside director as the chair of that committee (p. 28)
- The combination of nomination committee with a board composition with >33% independent directors (p. 30)
- Adopting a performance-linked compensation plan for executives (p. 29)
Various other factors that appear to correlate with superior performance, are shown on page 22, and page 34. We will explore the direction of causation with some of these later.
Pages 37-49 show the types of data we have collected, and special tools we have developed to use for screening for companies based on governance-related criteria, or for rapidly finding key disclosure sections in any type of report; or for automatically translating. The English version of these are largely complete, and will now be expanded upon.
Example pages are shown below. Feel free to contact us at: firstname.lastname@example.org if you have any questions. Thanks are due to Ben Garton and Korivi Ganesh for their contributions to this project.
Examples of correlation (or the lack thereof):
Impact of putting in place performance-linked compensation:
Impact of adding both a nominations committee, and having more than 33% independent directors: