A certified "public interest" nonprofit
The followingentry appeared as part of GovernanceMetrics International’s GMI Blog. GMI is the leading independent provider of global corporate governance and ESG ratings and research. Corporate stakeholders – including leading investors, insurers, auditors, regulators and others – use GovernanceMetrics services to identify and monitor risks related to non-financial measures covering key environmental, social, governance and accounting risk factors.
April 03, 2012
Hi all, writing to say that I submitted, as a US-based investor in Japanese equities, a comment that seems to touch on points similar to those BDTI advocates. In summary, since public companies' in Japan have boards comprised primarily of executive directors, training for a lone, or small majority of, outside director(s) is insufficient. More independent directors are of course welcomed from the point of view of investors. However, there needs to be assurance that executive and outside directors are qualified to serve as such.
Japan Society of California made Comments on the TSE’s February 28, 2012 Revisions to Listing Rules Regarding Corporate Governance to Restore Confidence in the Securities Market
In their comments, they brought up a topic regarding the education of directors.
The CFA Institute Standards and Financial Market Integrity Division and CFA Society of Japan made comments on the main item in the document, namely on the introduction of independent directors. And to ensure proper fulfillment of the function of independent director, CFA Institute strongly suggests proper training of directors, as below.